Why is this Important?
Whilst automation continues to bring efficiency to operational processes and practices and IoT data capabilities increase exponentially, a crucial element around human intervention remains unaddressed. Specifically, as incoming data indicates that an operational process is trending upward or downward and is approaching deviation from set thresholds, are the humans in proximity to this equipment aware, and can they proactively make decisions around appropriate actions, consulting additional support human support and/or schematics, flow charts, or other assets, where necessary? In 2018, McKinsey published an informative report on skill shifts, automation, and the future of the workforce, indicating that, while hours spent performing physical, manual, and basic cognitive skills would decrease by 14-15% between the years 2016 and 2030, higher cognitive skills, social and emotional skills, and technological skills would increase by 8, 24, and 55% respectively. This indicates a sharp departure from manual physical intervention and a transition to interaction between environmental data, people, and equipment in nuanced ways that involve rational analysis and resulting action.
Increasingly, industries are collecting mass amounts of operational data and parameters via IoT dashboards, though there is little guidance that enables the operator of the future to interpret this data and take appropriate action proactively. Deloitte’s 2020 Global Human Capital Trends report indicated that high-performance organizations are “evolving from a focus on automating work to replace workers, to augmenting workers with technology to create superjobs, to collaborating with technology to form superteams”. AR is specifically and ideally positioned to play a large role in this transition process for organizations across the globe.
This study would aim to specifically measure the tangible operational processes proactively improved by human intervention to a process prompted by a connected AR headset, providing data insights, as well as promoting appropriate proactive human behavior to maintain operational parameters/limits.
Stakeholders
Operational excellence professionals, chief operating officers, board of directors, safety and risk professionals
Possible Methodologies
The proposed research would need to identify operational processes for which operational parameters/thresholds have been defined and IoT data is available. Research would include current % of time operational process performs outside of appropriate limits/thresholds and introduction of AR data presentation, analysis, and intervention via A/B trial scenarios, potentially with a few different levels of AR intervention. Observe post-intervention data. Post-study operational process optimization time could be calculated and recommendations developed for future implementation.
Research Program
This study could be combined with existing research programs associated with metals and mining, oil and gas, aerospace, manufacturing, and operational excellence in general.
Miscellaneous Notes
There are valuable references related to automation and necessary upskilling contained in this report published by McKinsey. This report published by Deloitte focuses on guidance and learning “in the flow of work.”
Keywords
Automation, reskilling, skill development, augmentation, superjobs, superteams, operational excellence, IoT, process improvement, augmented reality, augmented reality, failure, indicators, just in time, mixed realities, optimization
Research Agenda Categories
Business, End User and User Experience, Use Cases, Displays
Expected Impact Timeframe
Near
Related Publications
Using the words in this topic description and Natural Language Processing analysis of publications in the AREA FindAR database, the references below have the highest number of matches with this topic:
More publications can be explored using the AREA FindAR research tool.
Author
Jennifer Rogers
Last Published (yyyy-mm-dd)
2021-08-31